Re: Rougtero Vivocefo

["John" <johnhogg@laf.cioe.com>]

>I prefer B, but it requires more work.  If a player isn't there, then
>his character shouldn't be used.  But if the player is in charge of
>something important, and immediate events demand a descision then there
>needs to be someone who can act and do so under GM control.
>
>Rick

Which reminds me ...

I WILL eventually get Simon posted to the group.  When I retired (actually,
actored)
him I always intended him for public use within the Rugtero setting.  How
better to
hook an adventure than to have the Head of External Investigation have you
run an
errand for him?

Likely I'll put about 5-10 more ratings in him to bring him up to the
ballpark of 50 or so.
(yes, I stopped playing him at about 40)

For the most part, if I don't announce a url to find his write-up, and you
want to use him,
drop me some E-mail so we can be fairly consistant on his role in the
adventure.

John

(hey folks, note the change in e-mail address ... I've got a .forward on
expert, though, so
an immediate change in trying to get hold of me shouldn't be necessary)