RE: Torite ruling

[Orion Furmanski <thelaw@expert.cc.purdue.edu>]

On Tue, 11 Aug 1998 rob@bchm1.aclcb.purdue.edu wrote:

> (foo's message was here on other action)
> 
> yeah at a glance it seems shady, but then again maybe there were other factors
> Once he agreed to the deal he would be honor bound to stick by it (if  it
> didn't violate tor's tenants).   To me (once again at a glance) i kind
> of see it as the hero giving the villain his one chance to get away. A
> noble action (repaying the favor) when most would ignore any promises or
> favors and simply apprehend the villain.  Of course this line of reasoning
> only applies if keith continues to pursue said villian.
> 
> (also i think keith is just not used to having a lot of lasting affect on 
> the world)
> 
> ----------------------------
> Subvert the Dominant Paradigm
> 

	I'm getting a kick out of seeing Tor's "tenants" violated,
hee-hee.  It's "TENETS", by the way. "Tenants" are
renters/inhabitants of a dwelling.  Anal-retentive human thesaurus has
spoken.

Orion