[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Fwd: Re: The T'or Ruling]
I happened to be in town this weekend and saw at a glance what happened
to Kieth's character... I did and still do think it was a screw.
Taking action of this sort without discussing it with the player is out
of line. If he had just done it, it may have been ok, as long as Dan was
consulted, he was there. I'm tired of a GM or two deciding that
"something should not be in the game" without discussing with the player
or other GM's. This GM's list is a perfect format, USE IT!
Cause has to follow effect, not one year later.
I agree with Steve's earlier posting and just don't think it was needed
AT ALL.
It got to me second hand that several GM's feel that Kieth has a magic
pencil. I find anyone who thinks this cannot make a decision of what is
and is not fair to Keith/ Kieth's character. If he has one, prove it.
Discuss with GM's and then have someone aproach him. There have been
mistaken cases in the past, we need to be sure. Let most Gm's know so we
can watch out for unusual behavior.
As the player who cast more than twenty mutates (including Kieths),
please discuss with me if any other mutate of mine has a problem. I have
started to give out numbers, and not remembering each GM that ruled on
each mutate, some adjudication, NOT SCREWING, may be required.
Joe
---- Begin included message ----
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Ames [SMTP:steve@ns1.cioe.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 1998 7:36 PM
> To: gmlist@ns1.cioe.com
> Subject: Re: The T'or Ruling
>
> Sorry Dan. Your going to have to give the word on this one as your
> the only one who can actually speak for T'or. I realize that this
> is a tricky political issue now because its already been done and
> decisions cannot be reversed without a loss of face. *sigh* That
> is why prior discussion is a good thing.
>
> [Daniel Lawrence] True... I did figure this out. As I have said, the process to
> get to this decision was on shaky ground.. but the decision itself was not
> unreasonable. But to complete the sequence, I have planned to run an
> adventure for this T'orite and those whom would stay with him next session.
> T'or is not a vengful diety seeking to disbar his adherents and priests, and
> he will take action appropriate to this situation to try to steer this errant
> priest back to the path of light.
Just a note on the above, Keith left alone at the end of the adventure for
the nearest Enclave at Kieron's Watch, trip time a month or so.
Wright
---- End included message ----