Re: The T'or Ruling

[Wright Frazier <khelek@ns1.cioe.com>]

> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Steve Ames [SMTP:steve@ns1.cioe.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, August 11, 1998 7:36 PM
> To:	gmlist@ns1.cioe.com
> Subject:	Re: The T'or Ruling
> 
> Sorry Dan. Your going to have to give the word on this one as your
> the only one who can actually speak for T'or. I realize that this
> is a tricky political issue now because its already been done and
> decisions cannot be reversed without a loss of face. *sigh* That
> is why prior discussion is a good thing.
> 
> [Daniel Lawrence]  True... I did figure this out. As I have said, the process to
> get to this decision was on shaky ground.. but the decision itself was not
> unreasonable. But to complete the sequence, I have planned to run an
> adventure for this T'orite and those whom would stay with him next session.
> T'or is not a vengful diety seeking to disbar his adherents and priests, and
> he will take action appropriate to this situation to try to steer this errant 
> priest back to the path of light.

Just a note on the above, Keith left alone at the end of the adventure for
the nearest Enclave at Kieron's Watch, trip time a month or so.


Wright