RE: GMing this Saturday

[Lyle H Janney <lhjanney@adpc.purdue.edu>]

But, Foo, you know that the 'continuing' game isn't closed this
week.  We're back at Lojem (tho, I think Kevin left the party in
Port Haven; it isn't like they can't get back to Rougtero easily
enough).  To quote Foo, he is running a continuation of Kevin's
_plotline_, not game.

I expect that there will be enough players this weekend for the
regular campaign to warrant 3 GM's, and I don't really see any
of the games being closed to others unless certain players are
specifically hooked or excluded by GM's (and I'm not sure I see
any reason for that).  Anyway, there you have it.

So, Joel, Mike and who else?  (I may be running newbies with
Dan if we have a good turn-out)

Also, Greg, Kevin's game lasted ~7 days beyond the game date
given last week.

Lyle

-----Original Message-----
From:	Foo [SMTP:fooboy@laf.cioe.com]

What he said.  In my humble opinion, I think 8 people on an adventure is
as many as there should ever be.  Otherwise, combats take forever, and
players get bored and start BSing with one another and disrupt what's
really going on...and then we sit there until 3am.

On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Sean L. McLane wrote:

> > From fooboy@laf.cioe.com Tue Aug 24 14:27:49 1999
> >
> > I'm also probably going to run this Saturday...a continuation of
> > Kevin's plotline.  
> 
> Considering that we had 14 players in my game this past Saturday (which took
> about 9 days, Greg), We might consider a third GM for the regular campaign,
> or perhaps a way to bring in a couple more players to the continuing game.