RE: "no"

[Lyle H Janney <lhjanney@adpc.purdue.edu>]

I emphatically agree with you, Jevan!  Hmmm, this isn't the first time 
that player had one thing adjudicated through one GM and then gone 
to another GM to have it further modified.  Hmmm...  I still feel that you 
guys all did the right thing last weekend.  BTW, in response to Steve's 
concern that the original adjudicating GM be involved anytime a player 
disputes a call and goes to a senior GM or Dan; I am also in complete 
agreement.  I may have done some things in the past that I have some 
regret over, but I have no intentions of making the same mistakes over 
again.  Are we on the same page?

Lyle

-----Original Message-----
From:	Jevan Furmanski [SMTP:furmansj@expert.cc.purdue.edu]

The player in question about the air elemental thing made a case and
pushed the group of gms into a resounding consensus of "no".  When he
implied that Dan would let him get mutated, I said that since Dan
Transmogrified him in the first place, and had already outlined
constraints for his new form, that teh ruling should come from Dan anyway.
Anytime that character does anything weird, it should go through the
adjudicating gm, so as to preserve consistancy.  If a gm is forced to make
precident, they should adjudicate on that precident until a new rule is
made/ clarified, and in the case of a senior or competent gm there is
nothing to worry about.

Jevan