[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: "no"

> I emphatically agree with you, Jevan!  Hmmm, this isn't the first time 
> that player had one thing adjudicated through one GM and then gone 
> to another GM to have it further modified.  Hmmm...  I still feel that you 
> guys all did the right thing last weekend.  BTW, in response to Steve's 
> concern that the original adjudicating GM be involved anytime a player 
> disputes a call and goes to a senior GM or Dan; I am also in complete 
> agreement.  I may have done some things in the past that I have some 
> regret over, but I have no intentions of making the same mistakes over 
> again.  Are we on the same page?

I don't completely understand how we could be... but yeah, that does
seem to be the case :)

						-Steve