RE: move through

[Steve Ames <steve@ns1.cioe.com>]

> I like Kris's suggestion of a combination of 1 and 4, but I can't
> bring myself to agree with the idea that you could still get more
> than one swing/attack in.  Move through is just that, run/fly/ride
> along, slash and continue.  A red-tailed hawk only gets one
> chance to grab the rabbit (unless the stupid rabbit is actually
> running along the same direction of the hawks' flight, that is).

Kris jump in if I've got your intent wrong. I believe her suggestion
of options 4 and 1 still limited things to one attack. Basically its
option 4 (one attack if you move) but with option 1 thrown in to say
that someone with skill could move even further (closer to their full
movement) and still get the one attack. No multiple attacks would be
allowed here (except in the case of quicken or other such magics).
This should be a pretty firm belief overall, agreed.

> On a side note, except for certain sub-skills, I like the idea of
> splitting the dice pool on a successful weapon's skill check.  Just
> so the group has my two cents on that one.

Excellent!

> Finally, if a combination of 1 and 4 turns out to be too complex for
> the system and thus wouldn't pass Dan, I'd back option 1 with the
> caveat that monsters would need to purchase skills for their natural
> weapons and other appropriate skills would be created for other
> valid situations.  I would have sided with option 4, but I feel that at
> least some practice would be necessary to actually move 1/4 
> speed and not have it affect your action.

Noted. Thanks for the input... now if everyone else would provide theirs
so we could get a consensus to vote on? (hint hint to you lurkers)

						-Steve