Re: World sizes and such

[Matthew Fahler <martuck@expert.cc.purdue.edu>]

I don't take it as an attack on my personal character.  I am currently
looking at revamping Reugtero this fall.  I mean it is about damn time the
town had a government and a lot of other things.  My point is that I want
you to consider the potential effects of the what is being done.  I think
a new setting is fine, but personally I was a little miffed that I had no
game options last week.  My point is that some people will look at it as a
good thing.  Some people will look at it as a bad thing.  Some won't care.
My main point is that we have to try to make all three potential settings
friendly for all characters and GMs.  I don't want lines of a war being
drawn in the club.  I don't want bickering and fighting because people
feel that they are being excluded and left out.  Whether you like it or
not all GMs have the right to interact with any setting.  It is their job
to do their research and such, but the only things that is reserved to a
limited number of GMs is rule modifications, magic item creation, and DI
adjudication.  All else is open, but I do believe that we need some new
guidelines for GMs.  
	I will be getting those write ups to you by the middle of the next
week.  I don't remember the name of the town, but I will have the Priest
of T'or write ups unless you don't want me to do them anymore.    

Matthew D. Fahler
Chemistry Teaching Major
Purdue University
Phone: 743-0002
Email: martuck@expert.cc.purdue.edu