Re: game date and mutate

[Wright Frazier <khelek@ns1.cioe.com>]

> Good point. Maybe the writeup on the parameters of regen should be
> elucidated. I'll bet Dan and crew never intended all this mutating for
> killer creature skills to become a serious issue. I agree with your point
> about DP being a sort of function of conditioning and metabolism, and a
> certain aspect of regen should deal with this as opposed to recovering
> limbs.
> 
>         Here's an idea: why not have mutations get adjudicated like magic
> item creations? Both are similar in that they leave alot to chance as the
> magic has its way.
>         --Expend additional finesses on the spell to refine the effect,
> e.g. muscles with an enhanced molecular structure for 2-3 finesses such
> that there is no additional mass or volume to the muscle. Or just use
> extra finesses so that less is left to the magical dice.
>         --Luck amulets? probably not...
> 
> Sooooo....roll a couple of d6 for the outcome, like magic items. High
> means better results than expected (not so freakish), low means extra
> penalties (a few have already been mentioned).
>                                       

I'd like to see something more definate written up on it, cause currently
a mutate is better than a magical item, and more common(or getting
that way).  There definately needs to be something more than 1
paragraph written up on it.

Wright
\