Re: Magic Items/Mages

[Wright Frazier <khelek@ns1.cioe.com>]

*nod* I agree..hmmm..development list?  not hard to do. =)
I could even try and make it a correctly done major domo this time. ;)
If that is what wants to be done with it.

However, I agree..I would like to see Mages more in the support
role again.

Wright

> I'd like to see some of the spell affects re-arranged. I realize
> that a lot of balancing went into this. But shifting some more
> pathetic spells down a few ranks would put low-mid level mages
> back into the support roll instead of immediately buying fireball
> so they could deal the damage. I rather liked the days of mages
> tossing flaming arrows and weapon charm and the priests cleaning
> up after the fight. Fighting isn't what mages and priests are
> all about (remember the troika?) yet they are still geared toward
> combat. This has nothing to do with Galeia or Rugtero, and isn't
> really a GM matter, but there isn't a development list (hint Dan)
> since things aren't _actively_ being developed anymore.
> 
> 						-Steve
>