[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Armor proposal 1




*bites his tongue against another historical spew*

Wright

> And to add to Wright's spew here... there is a direct correlation
> to the weapons that are used and the armor that is worn. Heavy
> swords that could go through armor (or at least bruise the hell out
> of the wearer) were the norm until guns popped up. Guns went through
> armor like it wasn't there so mobility started to be preferred. With
> lighter armor came lighter sword and more finesse. Errol Flynn never
> wore armor!
> 
> 						-Steve
>