[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Immobile

> From johnhogg@expert.cc.purdue.edu Fri Nov  6 16:50:31 1998
> Subject: Re: Immobile
>
> You get the gist, though.  Set the field for the person holding stuff to
> effect them, but make sure you are the frame of reference that's not
> moving.  (or that ring on the table, or that small pebble, or that
> otherwise conveniently portable object over there ...)
>
> John 
>

Then the GM bodily strikes the player for being a rules twisting dink.

I refer you back to my post about people pretzeling the rules.

It's going to happen, but it is going to take a huge a mount of effort.
What's more, I severely doubt that anyone with some degree of intelligence
is going to be able to convince themselves that an object that a 'conveniently
portable object' is immobile. Either it's immobile, or conveniently portable.

Pick one.

Sean L. McLane    |     I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed,
zodo@laf.cioe.com |         briefed, debriefed, or numbered.
                                My life is my own!
                                        -The Prisoner