Re: Blue Fields and Physics

[Jevan Furmanski <furmansj@expert.cc.purdue.edu>]

I'll just say, "that's crap".  Good spew though.  I understand that a
similar effect can be produced by modulating the quantum bozon flux of a
standing antimatter inversion wave through superfluid membrane of
overcharged top quarks.  But I could be wrong...  I haven't watched Star
Trek lately.


Jevan

On Fri, 6 Nov 1998, Sean L. McLane wrote:

> 
> Oh boy, are you in for the spew today:
> 
> Pseudo-scientific treknological explanation of Blue Fields:
> 
> When someone is placed in a blue field, Time is not stopped, but rather they 
> are taken out of the standard spacetime perceptual universe, and transported
> through the fourth dimension (that of time) to another point in standard 
> spacetime. The Blue Field that is perceived by observers still in the standard
> spacetime is not actually a field, but rather an analog image of what is being
> transported. The PFM (pure freaking magick) allows the image to stay locked 
> with the frame of reference from which it was removed, to the point where
> the subject of the spell effect is returned to normal space time. For the
> effects that only last 24 hours, this is a set duration, or a specific move
> through the fourth dimension. The effect that is permanent until revoked is
> indefinite, moving the subject through the fourth dimension until the effect
> can be dropped. The reason a revocation can be used on the image is because
> the image is an inherent part of the spell effect, and the revocation stops
> the effect, which is moving the subject through the fourth dimension. When
> it is revoked, the subject suddenly drops back in to standard spacetime, with
> the apparent effect of the 'blue field' dropping.
> 
> How's that sound?
> 
> Sean L. McLane    |     I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed,
> zodo@laf.cioe.com |         briefed, debriefed, or numbered.
>                                 My life is my own!
>                                         -The Prisoner
>