Re: drwoning/blue fields

[Wright Frazier <khelek>]

You refute your own argument.  You say in one point that you define
what it will remain relative too.  In this case a boat.  However in
another place you say that you can't define it relative to something
else.  The definition of relativity to another object should be
an unconcious thing.  Its just part of the spell's effect that is
done automatically, no thought involved.  Otherwise you leave the
door wide open for people to carry around thousands of bluefielded
spell effects.

Wright

> Why you stay where you stay when blue fielded? In my mind as I cast the
> spell I would think " I am bluefielding you there " and there is where
> you stay. Now if "there" is on the deck of a boat you go with the boat.
> If you bluefield someone on a ladder can you remove the ladder and not
> them? Obviously you can pull the ladder away and I would rule they stay
> there in the air. This is contrary to the other though. And this is
> where all the confusion is. Stick a kitten in a bag so the cat is supporting
> the bag and bluefield it. The bag should fall through it since it is
> now nothing. Maybe if you can normally just move the object it can't stick
> to it but if the object is not "normally" manually movable it stays stuck
> to it ( ie. cart, ship ). This breaks down though quickly if Enmass is
> brought into the picture. See the problems we are facing?
> 
> 						Greg
>