Re: 'big move'

["Michael Kilgore" <khaakon@lycosmail.com>]

>From what I lead to understand at first it was going to be mandatory then it
got changed to volutary.  I certainly hope that it is going to be volutary
because the way Wright was saying a couple of months ago that he was not
wanting adventurer of the likes of "Ezra, Difuge, Karl, etc.." over there.
This most certainly will exclude my favorite adventurer.

Thanks,
Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Ames <steve@ns1.cioe.com>
To: gmlist@cioe.com <gmlist@cioe.com>
Date: Friday, September 11, 1998 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: 'big move'


>> What ever happened to the "big move"?  Are we still going to do it?  We
>> (Wright et. all)  have put a consederable amount of work into the new
>> setting, and I assume not just because it makes us feel important.  If
the
>> gms aren't intending to move the campaign, then we need to know now.  It
>> just feels to me like no one seems to think that way anymore.
>
>Not having been present at the meeting where this was proposed and voted
>on in like a 20 minute span, I get to say that I never support it anyway.
>A _LOT_ of really good material has been created and the setting already
>has a good bit of player backing. However, the political situation kinda
>dictates leaving rougtero intact as a place for GMs and Players who will
>not make the move. It was going to be voluntary anyway right?
>
>I'm leaning toward all settings to just write up a one page writeup on
>their settings and what someone who plays there can expect. These just
>get distributed to players and to the newbies when they come over. Then
>nature takes its course.
>
> -Steve
>