Re: Move through

[Greg Mowczko <mooch@ns1.cioe.com>]

Plus each weapon has its own skill to buy and you can't use your
long sword skill with your dagger.
					Greg

> I don't like the idea.  Mainly cause its trying to do a whole lot of
> different things with 1 skill.  In my mind skills should have a narrow
> focus in what they allow you to do.  Weapon skill = dorking with a
> particular weapon.  Bludgeon = clocking someone in the head.  The skill
> you suggest offers several different abilities that really don't relate
> in how they are used.
>
> Wright
>  
> > Hmm.  Interesting.  If there was such a skill then it would work
> > like the proposed warrior one.  Wait....idea...why not move mage
> > spell casting skills (or priestly spell casting skills) under one
> > skill and have subskills.  I.E. base cost 200 or 300 and allow such
> > things as 1 handed casting (1d6 check or whatever), verbal casting,
> > nonverbal casting (yes I know there is a debate about whether mages
> > can use this one), quicktarget, and movement.  That way mages could
> > move the 1/5 movement rate no check , but then move the additional
> > amount using their movement skill.  This would make "mage" fighting
> > skills similar to the weapon skill of the warrior.  I like it
> > consistent!
> > 
> > -Kris
> > 
> > ----------
> > From: Preston Wiley <quotha@laf.cioe.com>
> > 
> > I think that maybe a new skill could be introduced that covers
> > moving will
> > casting. We already have Non-verbal, verbal, and one-handed. How
> > about a
> > skill that covers this?
> > 
> > 						- Preston