[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: whale
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Matthew Fahler wrote:
> Jevan,
> In regards to what you wrote about adamantite being infinitely
> malleable. This is not the way it works. If something were infinitely
> malleable it is easy to beat into sheets. The easier something is to beat
> into a sheet the less protective it would be. YOu wouldn't die from
> external cuts, but you sure would die from the internal bleeding you would
> get from the brute force of the blows.
>
> Matthew D. Fahler
> Chemistry Teaching Major
> Purdue University
> Phone: 743-0002
> Email: martuck@expert.cc.purdue.edu
>
>
>
Malleability relates to the extent that a metal can be drawm or beaten
into sheets, not the ease. This property is independant of yield
strength, even though the two are often related. You are wrong, I just
didn't explain my terms well enough. I admit a one atom sheet of
Adamantite would be very weak.
- References:
- Re: whale
- From: Matthew Fahler <martuck@expert.cc.purdue.edu>