[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Nomadic matrix gems are a BEND

To: furmansj@ecn.purdue.edu (Jevan Furmanski)
Subject: Re: Nomadic matrix gems are a BEND
From: "Kevin Collins" <kcollins@bilbo.bio.purdue.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:15:47 -0500 (EST)
Cc: gmlist@cioe.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.05.9901290013130.27142-100000@tools.ecn.purdue.edu> from "Jevan Furmanski" at Jan 29, 99 00:20:30 am

Jevan,

	Having a spell caster with zero spell units touch a matrix gem is 
useless.  Adding an additional 50% of zero is still zero units.

Kevin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Nomadic matrix gems are a BEND
  - From: Jevan Furmanski <furmansj@ecn.purdue.edu>

References:
- Re: Nomadic matrix gems are a BEND
  - From: Jevan Furmanski <furmansj@ecn.purdue.edu>

Prev by Date: Why we play certain backgrounds less.
Next by Date: Re: Nomadic matrix gems are a BEND
Prev by thread: Re: Nomadic matrix gems are a BEND
Next by thread: Re: Nomadic matrix gems are a BEND
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread