[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wright's Proposals




1) Weapon DVs should stay the same I'd think.  Protectiveness of the weapon
	doesn't change, simply the style its being employed in.

2) Chainmail is not worn alone.  There is padding underneath, and still
	even when worn alone, the surface tension of the armor is enough
	to deflect a considerable portion of the impact.  Clothing would
	help you considerably LESS than mail would..with or without
	padding.

Wright

> 
> Wright, just wanted a clarification.  If you use a normally one-handed 
> weapon two handed, your CDV and GDV do not go up by one, correct?  What 
> is the case if one uses a two-handed weapon one handed?
> 
> Also, regarding the increase of MDV of chain, did you consider both 
> ballistic (bullets, arrows, etc.) AND imapct (rocks, concusion-type 
> stuff)?  I can see that chain would be better than heavy clothing against 
> the ballistic weapons but, if being hit by a big ol' blunt object, I'd 
> perfer the "coshiness" of the clothing.
> 
> 
> B.J. Austin
> jedi@ecn.purdue.edu
> 
> 
> "This country has come to feel the same when Congress is in session
>  as when the baby gets hold of a hammer."
> 						- Will Rogers
> 
> 
>