Re: grapple replies

["Kris Ames" <kris@cioe.com>]

Everyone,

On the common sense issue...I totally agree...But why is it every GM
without exception let nikko grapple to hold people etc.  Humm... A
concrete weight ratio might be a nice blurb on the end..ie no creature or
person may not successfully grapple to hold any other creature or person
who weight ration (grappler weight/grapplee weight) is less than .5.  Yes
i know their are spells that effectively increase weight, but if you
weigh as much of an elephant and can hold on you could probably grapple
to hold an elephant even if you are a person.

-Kris
----------
From: Flightgod5@aol.com
To: gmlist@ns1.cioe.com
Subject: grapple replies
Date: Wednesday, November 11, 1998 1:40 PM

Wright has the jist of it.  EVerything he said will be considered and
most
likely added into the proposal.  Additional d6 will be added as the
grapple
progresses, and stressors will get to add 2d6 to their pool.  In response
to
Greg's message, I think it's basically a common sense thing on the part
of the
GM.  Just assign a reasonable check for the drako to pluck off the puny
human
that thought it could grapple him.

Joel